Skip to content

Choose which optional content this site may load. You can change this at any time from the Cookie Settings link at the bottom of the page.

Necessary

Remembers your cookie and accessibility choices in your browser. Always on.

Allows audience measurement tools to load, if this site uses them.

Allows content from other services, such as embedded social media posts, to load. These services may set their own cookies.

This site shows ads from Google AdSense. Allowing this lets Google use cookies to show ads based on your interests. Without it, you see non-personalized ads.

Accessibility

Text size 100%

Settings are saved in this browser.

World

Labour’s Sagal Abdi-Wali Defeats Zack Polanski in Holborn and St Pancras

Labour’s Sagal Abdi-Wali won the Holborn and St Pancras parliamentary election held on October 8, 2026, defeating Green Party leader Zack Polanski in the London constituency previously represented by Keir Starmer. The official parliamentary results give her 12,292 votes against his 8,928, a majority of 3,364.

Editorial illustration of a blank ballot and ballot box with Westminster in the background
Ballot Box and Westminster · Disclaimer

A Parliamentary Seat Stays With Labour

The vacancy followed Starmer’s resignation as an MP in September, according to Parliament’s announcement published on October 9. This was a contest to choose one constituency’s representative in the House of Commons, rather than a national election or a vote for Camden Council.

The Conservatives’ Ewan Cameron finished third with 1,922 votes, followed by Reform UK’s Pete Newman with 1,612. Liberal Democrat Patrick Stillman received 924. These figures establish the order of the leading candidates without relying on conflicting secondary calculations of turnout and rejected ballots.

From Camden Council to Westminster

Abdi-Wali entered the contest with experience in local government. Camden Council’s May 20, 2026 announcement records her appointment as council leader, following her first election as a councillor in 2022 and service as cabinet member responsible for better homes.

The council described her as its first Black woman leader and said she had arrived in Camden as a child refugee. BBC reporting identifies her as having come from Somalia in the 1990s and describes her election as the first time a British Somali has won a seat in Parliament.

Her council portfolio centred on housing, while her leadership announcement emphasised public services, neighbourhood safety and opportunities for young people. Those are documented elements of her public record. They do not, by themselves, establish her position on Israel or Gaza.

The Green Party’s Israel Policy

Polanski’s defeat came four days after Green Party members adopted a motion formally establishing the party as anti Zionist. Its October 4 announcement recorded 1,022 votes in favour and 813 against at the party conference.

The announcement described Zionism as an ethnonationalist political project, distinguished opposition to Zionism from antisemitism, and endorsed the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement and a full arms embargo. It also supported a single democratic state throughout historic Palestine, a position directly relevant to Israel’s future as a Jewish state.

These were adopted party positions, not British government decisions. The election adds a new political development to that debate: the party leader failed to win the parliamentary seat he contested. The result alone does not establish that the Israel policy caused his defeat.

Reactions and the Limits of the Result

In its official October 9 response, the Green Party expressed disappointment but said it intended to continue building support. That statement came from a party spokesperson. Separately, The Standard reported that Polanski said he would remain leader and continue growing the party.

The party linked its campaign to housing costs, public ownership and Palestinian rights. That is its own account of the campaign’s significance, rather than independent evidence of individual voters’ motivations.

For Abdi-Wali, the immediate outcome is a move from local leadership to parliamentary representation. For the Greens, the result leaves their newly adopted Israel policy in place while their leader remains outside the Commons. Neither outcome justifies assigning an unrecorded position on Gaza to the winning candidate.

Back to Latest News