Skip to content

Choose which optional content this site may load. You can change this at any time from the Cookie Settings link at the bottom of the page.

Necessary

Remembers your cookie and accessibility choices in your browser. Always on.

Allows audience measurement tools to load, if this site uses them.

Allows content from other services, such as embedded social media posts, to load. These services may set their own cookies.

Accessibility

Text size 100%

Settings are saved in this browser.

Explainers & Analysis Opinion

If Ireland wants Palestine so badly, why not create it in Ireland?

If Ireland is so committed to a Palestinian state, here is a deliberately uncomfortable suggestion: offer it a place in Ireland. Put territory, public money and security guarantees on the table, and see how the conversation changes when responsibility comes home.

Illustration: families with luggage in an airport arrivals hall where an Irish flag hangs, with an aircraft visible through the windows
Editorial illustration: Palestine in Ireland? An opinion column · Disclaimer

This is a satirical challenge to political leaders, not a proposal to remove Palestinians from their homeland. Any hypothetical arrangement would require the free agreement of the people affected. Neither Irish citizens nor Palestinians are pieces to be moved around a map.

What Ireland has already committed to

Ireland formally recognized Palestine on May 28, 2024. Its stated policy supports two states on the basis of the 1967 borders, alongside Israel. That matters: Dublin is not officially proposing to abolish Israel, and recognizing Palestinian statehood is not the same as endorsing Hamas.

External / Social Media

Allows content from other services, such as embedded social media posts, to load. These services may set their own cookies.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioOYVr9VDFM

The obvious objection

The obvious objection is also a fair one. Palestinian claims concern their own homeland, not Irish territory. Refusing to create Palestine in Ireland would not, by itself, prove hypocrisy. But the provocation raises a harder question: what responsibility should distant advocates accept for the security arrangements they want others to live with?

What would Dublin be prepared to guarantee?

A declaration of statehood cannot answer who controls weapons, who protects a border or what happens if an armed faction rejects an agreement. Those are decisions that shape whether a family can sleep safely. They deserve at least as much attention as a diplomatic ceremony.

Imagine an Irish cabinet considering a comparable security commitment close to home. We should expect detailed safeguards, credible enforcement and an honest account of failure. Asking for the same seriousness when Israeli lives are involved is reasonable. Palestinian civilians also need protection from armed groups and failed government.

Dublin should make its commitments concrete: what it would fund, what it would help enforce and how it would respond if agreed conditions were broken. Humanitarian assistance and diplomacy can be valuable; neither removes the need to answer these questions.

So, Palestine in Ireland?

So, Palestine in Ireland? As satire, the idea puts the cost of political certainty under a spotlight. The serious demand behind it is simple: if Ireland wants to help shape a Palestinian state, it should explain the responsibilities it is prepared to carry. Solidarity should come with a plan, and a signature beneath it.

Back to Latest News