Skip to content

Choose which optional content this site may load. You can change this at any time from the Cookie Settings link at the bottom of the page.

Necessary

Remembers your cookie and accessibility choices in your browser. Always on.

Allows audience measurement tools to load, if this site uses them.

Allows content from other services, such as embedded social media posts, to load. These services may set their own cookies.

This site shows ads from Google AdSense. Allowing this lets Google use cookies to show ads based on your interests. Without it, you see non-personalized ads.

Accessibility

Text size 100%

Settings are saved in this browser.

Politics & Diplomacy

A Qatari Diplomat Rushed to Defend @Wallface. Eitan Fischberger Says That Proves His Point

Eitan Fischberger called @Wallface a Qatari influence operation posing as an American voice. Within hours, Qatar's deputy chief of mission in Washington, Hamad Al-Muftah, stepped in to defend the account, even though no one had tagged him.

Screenshots of Eitan Fischberger's and Hamad Al-Muftah's posts on X over Doha and Washington skylines
Fischberger and Al-Muftah posts · Disclaimer

A diplomat who was not tagged

Eitan Fischberger had posted a video about @Wallface the day before. In it he described the account as a Qatari psyop whose operator pretends to be American. The reply that followed, he wrote on October 8, came from a direction he had never tagged: Qatar's deputy ambassador to the United States.

"Strange coincidence, isn't it?" Fischberger asked.

The diplomat is Hamad Al-Muftah, deputy chief of mission at Qatar's embassy in Washington. A senior foreign official choosing to defend an anonymous political account that presents itself as American is the detail at the centre of Fischberger's case.

What Al-Muftah said, and what he did not

Al-Muftah answered that he engages with everyone and that his 3,700 followers could not explain the roughly 40,000 following @Wallface. He accused Fischberger of taking the Qatari prime minister's words out of context, said bots threaten anyone who engages with anti Qatar messaging, and listed what he called Fischberger's "basic tactics".

He did not say who runs @Wallface. He did, however, offer an explanation for why the account had changed its listed location: the bot threats, he suggested, might be the reason. Fischberger's criticism turned on where the person behind the account really is, and the Qatari diplomat's answer went straight to that point.

Why the question lands

Fischberger's challenge did not come out of nowhere. In an earlier post dated October 6, he said Qatar had told CNN it does not run foreign influence operations against the West, while he had exposed one on X weeks before.

The public record on Qatar's influence spending is long. Researchers at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies wrote in June 2026 that Qatar has spent more than $235 million on US lobbying and public relations firms, according to Foreign Agents Registration Act filings. A Washington Examiner review of Justice Department records found that after the 2024 US election, more than half of Qatari agents' media contacts went to conservative outlets and commentators, up from about 10% before it. The US Education Department's foreign funding database, launched in January 2026, lists Qatar as the largest foreign funder of American universities, at $6.6 billion.

The same FDD researchers described Eekad, an Arabic platform that presents itself as independent fact checking, as showing patterns that point to Qatari control.

The question still waiting for an answer

Al-Muftah's reply spent its words on Fischberger. It did not tell readers who is behind @Wallface, where that person is, or why a diplomat in Washington was following a dispute in which he had not been named.

Those are the questions Fischberger put on the table. Until someone answers them, the speed of Qatar's response remains his strongest piece of evidence.

Back to Latest News